For Dawkins

Dear Richard Dawkins

Good Morning

My dear friend Richard, I must applaud you on your most Sane, Rational, and Sensible Book, the God Delusion. It is the very height of literary mastermind, unrivaled in all of human history, for over a Million Years, since Man evolved from an Ape. It is probably the Next Step in Evolution, and the move towards the Superman of which Niche spoke. This book has toppled civilizations, raised Kings and kingdoms, destroyed, saved, healed, and much more, all in a perfectly real and rational way.

I appreciate your perfectly calm and rational discussion, sensitively and carefully exploiting the weaknesses of the absurd theory of God, without even the slightest hint of name-calling involved (Not that it matters, of course. Name-calling has strict evolutionary origins, and should not be repressed).

But sir, most recently, I have been struggling with a most serious issue: are you being only slightly Naive? You posit that no intelligence backs the universe, and that is all well and good... but then you claim, irrationally, that there is an intelligence behind Man. As I heard you once say, "We must not look for a purpose in Mountains, as if they were countertops." I totally understand your reasoning behind ascribing no purpose to Mountains, but what about countertops? Why should they have a purpose either? Isn't it far more rational that Cameras have no intelligence behind them, any more than eyes, and that Telephones have no mind designing them, any more than the Human Ear?

Isn't this a far more sane and rational conclusion? As you say, it is irrational to claim an intelligence behind the universe, just because science hasn't progressed enough to say otherwise. That is perfectly sane, rational, and logical: but isn't it equally irrational to claim that there must be an intelligence behind Human Creations, just because science, in its current form, cannot offer another explanation?

Aren't you being a little naive? You obviously think yourself very intelligent, but haven't you considered that, as a little extension of your Masterful Writing should soon show, No Intelligence Exists At All? That would be far more consistent than to ascribe intelligence to Man but not to God.

But anyway. I hope you are feeling well today, and again, I must praise the Literary Masterpiece of the last ten Millenniums: the God Delusion. Great health and life to you and your descendants.

Your mildly concerned friend:

Me. 

Comments

  1. Rodolphus the HoundJuly 25, 2025 at 9:15 AM

    MAN DOES NOT EXIST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rodolphus the HoundJuly 25, 2025 at 9:16 AM

      No he doesn't. I have studied men for decades, and they most emphatically do not exist.

      Delete
  2. I am extremely confused who on earth is Dawkins

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rodolphus the HoundJuly 25, 2025 at 9:16 AM

      Dawkins is a Man. He doesn't exist.

      Delete
    2. I actually think you are right

      Delete
    3. Freethinking PuppyJuly 25, 2025 at 9:17 AM

      We shall cast aside the colonialist oppression of the Existence of Man, and henceforth discard all irrational presuppositions, and say that Man does not exist.
      If you claim that Man exists, you hate puppies.

      Delete
    4. I like Puppies

      Delete
    5. Now that I think of it this guy should exist or else we will be talking to nothing

      Delete
    6. and why would the Midnight Dagger talk to nothing

      Delete
  3. Sammy from CaliforniaJuly 25, 2025 at 9:18 AM

    Richard Dawkins sounds important

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rodolphus the HoundJuly 25, 2025 at 9:19 AM

      That's because he doesn't exist!

      Delete
    2. Freethinking PuppyJuly 25, 2025 at 9:19 AM

      Sammy, let me ask a question: do you hate puppies? If not, you will not think that Man exists.

      Delete
    3. Sammy from CaliforniaJuly 25, 2025 at 9:20 AM

      oh

      Delete
    4. To Rodolphus the Hound: that makes a lot of sense

      Delete
    5. Sammy from CaliforniaJuly 25, 2025 at 9:32 AM

      I love puppies they're my favorite animal

      Delete
    6. Sammy from CaliforniaAugust 8, 2025 at 5:33 AM

      why did you talk about Dawkins if he isn't important

      Delete
    7. To Rodolphus the Hound that doesn't make any sense

      Delete
  4. Wendy from WashingtonJuly 25, 2025 at 9:21 AM

    What is going on?????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rodolphus the HoundJuly 25, 2025 at 9:21 AM

      NOTHING, because MAN DOES NOT EXIST!

      Delete
    2. Then do Monkeys exist?

      Delete
    3. Freethinking PuppyJuly 25, 2025 at 9:22 AM

      Monkeys, as rational beings, cannot exist without denying the existence of man. Otherwise, they are irrational, and are ordinary animals.

      Delete
    4. to Rodolphus The Hound: that is a lot pf sense

      Delete
    5. Sammy from CaliforniaJuly 25, 2025 at 9:25 AM

      Hey don't you think that I exist

      Delete
    6. Sammy from CaliforniaJuly 25, 2025 at 9:28 AM

      anyone do thinks that I do not exist definitely do not know there geography

      Delete
    7. wait a Minute Man does exist

      Delete
  5. well at least woman exist

    ReplyDelete
  6. hello everybody I think Monkey is a Pizza

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lenderthrondian

Library Article: Business, State, and Church